In ancient times surgeries were viewed in a theatre where one could watch and learn. However, most surgeries today are isolated to the direct participants. The “black box” would give a real-time analysis of surgical performance, errors, and endless feedback.
The problem is the not the data itself but the potential downside use of the data for malpractice litigation. Most surgeons of course, would avoid adding suit-risk to their practice, if indeed litigation is the use that is given the most press. Yet it is sad to ignore the potential of such devices that have potential clinical application in many other settings, such as in the Emergency Department and in the heart catheterization lab.
For most the use of the term “black box” is a bit Orwellian. We are not in 1984 and most physicians, even many surgeons, recognize the value in real-time feedback. Being human, mistakes happen, and any device that enables more comprehensive observation of the care process, giving guidance when needed, will be well appreciated. BUT, that appreciation will disappear if the name “black box” is used or the “look over your shoulder” aspect is the one that is emphasized. Even many up-to-date cars warn drivers of impending accidents. Why not the same in the surgical suite? As with most innovation, though, the devil is in the details and the marketing of such products is key. These provide feedback in a manner no different from any other clinical decision support (CDS) device. Advice from a CDS system can be either accepted or rejected, and the ultimate responsibility remains that of the physician in charge.
Similarly, the advent of Google Glass, with its ability to record every viewpoint, is in the same vein, and may make the concept of the “black box” already obsolete.
What will surgeons do? 1. Resist if able? 2. Perform only life-threatening surgery in these arenas? 3. Try to perform most surgeries in a “Surgicenter” (non-hospital base outpatient surgery centers” where they have more control on policies.)? These are doubtful. Most likely they will initially explore, then comply with whatever mandate requires use of real-time feedback technology. Indeed, providers may be forced to behave as if always on camera (and that may be a good thing).
If items like a “black box” and or “Google Glass” are implemented, it will change how providers interact with patients. The providers will need and Electronic Health Record like XpressTechnologies with a proven malpractice track record to mitigate any potential claims or problems. With XpressTechnologiesElectronic Health Record, acting lessons, and courses in interpersonal relations, the provider will be able to help explain the “videotape” and survive the future.
Xpress was created to both assist in efficient patient care and documenting the proper criteria to support physician decisions. And for that reason, it too is worth exploring!